Claude finished @jlaneve's task —— View job

Code Review Complete ✅

I've reviewed the PR changes for code quality, potential issues, and best practices.

Todo List:

• Read and analyze .gitignore changes
• Read and analyze CLAUDE.md changes
• Read and analyze internal/cli/list.go changes
• Read and analyze internal/cli/status.go changes
• Review for code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Evaluate security concerns
• Review test coverage implications
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

✅ Overall Assessment: LGTM

This PR successfully removes outdated task description references and adds appropriate gitignore entries. The changes are clean, consistent, and improve user experience.

Code Quality & Best Practices

• Consistent Updates: All references to [task-description] parameter removed consistently across CLI help text and documentation
• Documentation Alignment: CLAUDE.md examples now match actual CLI behavior
• Proper Gitignore: Adding .claude/ follows best practices for excluding tool-specific directories

Specific Changes Reviewed

.gitignore (✅ Good)

• Adding .claude/ directory exclusion is appropriate for Claude Code settings
• Properly categorized with descriptive comment
• Follows existing file structure and naming conventions

CLAUDE.md (✅ Good)

• Removes [task-description] from 4 command examples (lines 71, 125, 138, 146)
• Documentation now accurately reflects current CLI behavior
• Examples remain clear and helpful without the parameter

internal/cli/list.go:53 & internal/cli/status.go:63 (✅ Good)

• Help text updated consistently in both commands
• Suggestion text when no sessions exist is now accurate
• Maintains helpful user guidance while removing obsolete parameter

Potential Issues & Considerations

No Issues Found ❌

• No bugs, security concerns, or performance impacts identified
• Changes are purely cosmetic/documentation updates
• No breaking changes to functionality

Test Coverage ⚠️ Minor Consideration

• The test plan in PR description looks appropriate
• Consider adding a simple test to verify help text accuracy
• No existing functionality is modified, so regression risk is minimal

Security & Performance

• Security: No security implications - changes are documentation/text only
• Performance: No performance impact - static text changes only

Recommendations

1. Merge-Ready: This PR is ready to merge as-is
2. Future Enhancement: Consider adding CLI integration tests to catch help text regressions
3. Documentation: Changes improve accuracy of documentation examples

Verdict: ✅ Approved - Clean, consistent removal of obsolete parameter references with appropriate gitignore addition.